Work Reform

10012 readers

480 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

330

Remote Walmart Employees Slam Company After Being Forced To Relocate To Arkansas; Several Already Quit (www.ibtimes.co.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Remote Walmart employees across the United States are now questioning the company's newly implemented in-person work policy. Some employees who have been ordered to relocate are even considering resigning.

In May, Walmart mandated that hundreds of remote workers relocate to its corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, or its other hubs in Hoboken, New Jersey, and Northern California. A recent Bloomberg report revealed that employees opposed the return-to-office mandate during a company-wide Zoom call, with some resigning.

During the call, one participant described the RTO policy as "a bunch of bullsh-t." In contrast, others expressed concerns about the challenges of living in Arkansas, childcare arrangements, increased workload, and the potential impact on their partners' careers due to the relocation.

A Walmart employee informed Bloomberg that he decided to resign from the company rather than relocate on such short notice. According to the report, employees unable to relocate must terminate their employment with the company between August 2024 and January 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 130 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Being forced to relocate like that should constitute a contract renegotiation and these folks should get severance and unemployment.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

what contract? renegotiate?

you must not be American

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's almost like that offer letter than you signed is a contract that specifies your job duties, pay, benefits, and time off. If you have a union, then there is a whole other contract as well.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hardly the sort of contract that is ever subject to renegotiation, or even any initial negotiation. It's all very one-sided.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Every raise is a renegotiation. Every promotion is one.

I've negotiated almost all my offer letters. Everytime we discuss salary for whatever I've applied for its a negotiation.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (16 replies)