this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1367 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

5228 readers
2542 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1367
Elon (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (33 children)

Do people really think we'll colonize mars soon?

Colonizing the bottom of the ocean would be orders of magnitude cheaper, and more practical. Same with Antarctica. And there's a reason we don't do that.

I hate to sound anal, but I don't think the public appreciates how monumentally difficult space travel is, and how it gets exponentially worse with every ounce you have to carry. Even with theoretical, morally questionable tech like fission fragment drives or whatever.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Spaceships in many ways are safer than sitting at the bottom of a ditch with 7 miles of water sitting on top of you at 30,000 atmospheres of pressure.

It's also darker at the bottom of the ocean than in space.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Again... it's hard to appreciate how insanely difficult space travel is.

Just as an example, the lower stages of rockets are kind of like coke cans in terms of how much fuel they carry vs the actual machine itself. The engineering is insane. Just dropping a big chassis into the ocean in so much cheaper its hilarious.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, space travel is insanely difficult.

But there is a reason why we still have not discovered the majority of the ocean. Because it is even more difficult.

load more comments (31 replies)