this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
78 points (92.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1870 readers
387 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think your heart is in the right place, but this is a false equivalence.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How does what GP said not satisfy the definition of victim blaming? And if it is victim blaming, then where's the false equivalence?

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever been warned by several governments that where you plan to travel almost guarantees rape? I do know several countries where they've earned against war/travel because of war.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Absolutely. There are several international organizations that maintain travel advisories.

That said, they weren't tourists. They owned a family business there. And in any case, it's not right to blame victims for violence inflicted on them. It may not be smart to walk through Gary, Indiana at night, but if you get mugged it's still not your fault that someone inflicted violence on you. It's never a woman's fault that she got raped, despite how provocatively she dressed or which dodgy bar she chose to visit.

You said that it's a false equivalency to compare this case to the hypothetical rape case, and it is not. They are both examples of victim blaming, which is simply not justifiable.