this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
11 points (86.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40174 readers
567 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
11
Hard drive format? (programming.dev)
submitted 3 months ago by beefsquatch@programming.dev to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm setting up a new hard drive and formatted it as exFAT. I liked the cross platform support and not having to deal with permissions when mounting the device. BUT it doesn't support hardlinks, which I want to use for the *arr apps. Is NTFS the best pick, and I'll just have to live with read only on mac?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beefsquatch@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ohhh I didn't realize it didn't matter if it was accessed over the network with samba. This'll just be on a Debian server

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, so in that case I'd just use ext4 or, if you want checksums, btrfs (though this doesn't matter too much as btrfs currently doesn't support raid in any real sense, so it can't actually correct the data, just tell you it's bad).

ZFS can do the checksums with RAID and error correction, but getting that on Linux (without using a specialty distro like TrueNAS Scale) is still a pain.