Privacy

31238 readers

741 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Has Mullvad ever been given a court order to reveal personal info about a user? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by communism@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been reading through Signal's government requests and couldn't find a similar section on Mullvad's website. I'd be curious to read about them if there are any. It would seem unlikely to me that Mullvad has never received any kind of court order for information about a user.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I currently pay Mullvad with a recurring charge on my credit card.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They brought it back? That's concerning

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They realized banning convenience is bad for business. You can still pay in private ways

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

When they announced it, they said it would be bad for business, but that they valued their customers privacy more than the cost it would cause in lost business.