this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1310 points (96.2% liked)

memes

10181 readers
2726 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, how much could a web browser cost anyways? Here’s $20.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would actually like to know how much it cost. And how much each user "should" pay so it becomes viable.

Though I would really think that public institutions should use firefox as a base browser instead of edge/chrome as being open source is usually a big plus for public agencies that need to really control what's going on in their computers. And thus being a big source of financial support for firefox.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Someone above posted that they have a revenue of 593 million dollars per year. Presumably somewhat below that is going to be their yearly costs.

And according to this, they have around 160 million desktop Firefoxes showing up, which is going to be roughly how many active users there are.

593 / 160 would be $3.71 per user.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Maybe ad-supported version?

Like the Opera browser in 2000s.

[–] ElCanut@jlai.lu 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I have a very mouthy Jackson who says no.