this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
143 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morry040@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

One thing that aggravates my parents (definite No voters) is that there is no acknowledgement from the Yes campaign of the internal failures of previous bodies like ATSIC. It's fair to state that the government dismantled bodies like ATSIC, but the Yes campaign seem to be deliberately hiding or ignoring the fraud, corruption, ineffectiveness, and nepotism that existed in these organisations.

One can read all about the structural problems, lack of accountability, and failure to deliver results that were detailed in the parliamentary findings on ATSIC. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Former_Committees/indigenousaffairs/report/final/c02

If you have library access, the 2003 report, In the Hand of the Regions, is also worth a read: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26479564

There were also criminal investigations launched into both the Chief of ATSIC, Geoff Clark, and the deputy chairman, "Sugar" Ray Robinson.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11071533/Geoff-Clark-ex-ATSIC-chief-facing-2million-fraud-charges-threatens-senator-Jacinta-Price.html
https://www.smh.com.au/national/former-atsic-leader-sugar-ray-in-court-20060118-gdmsov.html

For No voters like my parents, they question why we should force a similar organisation into the Constitution, particularly when there were so many systemic (and even criminal) problems with ATSIC.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In all honesty, having read those same reports in the past (does it make me a weirdo that I enjoy reading this kind of thing?) I note that many of the individuals involved in this corruption were installed by LNP governments (tempted to say "of future past," because that just sounds fun). I smell false flag on their part, as they have been known to install cronies into organisations they're opposed to so they can tear it down and claim they're 'fixing' them

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The corruption happened because they were given a budget with no oversight. The Voice is only an advisory body with no budget to control.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I'd honestly ask them what the fuck that has to do with enshrining Indigenous representation in parliament tbh.

Oh no a govt body was corrupt!!! Do they want to remove the ability for all Australians to vote because of robodebt? Because that makes as much fcking sense.

[–] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed. One of my family members worked for ATSIC from the beginning, wanting to do good. They resigned in disgust at the corruption before it was exposed and torn down. It's an ugly bit of history that is being ignored.

[–] billytheid@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I’m sure that’s their defining motivator…

It’s not at all that they’re ignorant, rusted on, bigots

[–] morry040@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perhaps, but calling them names and hurling insults is never going to change their mind. It may even embolden their position because name-calling usually means that you don't have a good response to their argument.

[–] billytheid@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

posted in wrong thread