this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
58 points (93.9% liked)
Gaming
19998 readers
115 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It feels completely natural to me, but I think it is unintuitive, and games which feature it without explaining it are disadvantaging people with less gaming literacy.
It's similar to the mechanic in shooting games, where reloading while there is at least one bullet in the gun results in a faster reload (because the gun doesn't need to be cocked).
It's realistic, but I feel that it should be ignored, in the same way each bullet from the old mag magically transfers into a new mag.
It shouldn't be ignored full stop. It depends entirely on the game. A purely arcade shooter should probably ignore it and most do (halo, overwatch), but a sim certainly shouldn't (tarkov, arma). And a mixed game can decide for themselves (battlefield, cod).
Or even leave it up to the player.
Only in single player though.
Multiplayer reload speed is a knob for balance.
Now I want an fps game where you have to stop and load each round into magazines for a while.
Some do this, tarkov is a popular example.