this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)

Games

16758 readers
1455 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/41940

AEGIS-CWA will represent workers across departments including brand marketing, games as service, localization, marketing services, product development operations, product development, sales, quality assurance teams, more, becoming the largest multi-discipline video game union in the United States.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There should be certain base rights that are protected in any contract. For example, at one extreme, selling yourself into slavery shouldn't be recognized by the courts.

Large organizations have more resources to screw over smaller organizations and individuals, so if we're going to favor one, we should favor the smaller party.

I'm generally a fan of minimal government interference, but contracts are one area where people can easily get screwed over. I think governments absolutely have a place in arbitrating contract disputes, and part of that is deciding what is and isn't a valid contract.

One thing that I think can help is requiring contracts to have a legally binding summary that is easily understandable by the average person. Anything that only exists in fine print would likely be unenforceable unless a reasonable person would expect it to be there. So for employment, the company would need to be upfront about their unionization policy, out it would likely be an unenforceable part of the contract. I don't know the details of how that could work in practice, but the fact is that many people don't understand what they're agreeing to when they sign contracts.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For example, at one extreme, selling yourself into slavery shouldn’t be recognized by the courts.

So I don't truly own myself, the government does?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you really trying to argue that you should be allowed to enslave yourself or others?