this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
184 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16752 readers
601 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
184
Palworld's community manager says our 'dead game' fixation is ruining gaming: 'I don't think it really serves anyone to push gamers to play the same game, day in and day out' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pika@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I would like to state, while its not said it's implied, the statement "palworld is dead" is not correct anyway, Palworld is currently ranked 34th in players active on it at the moment on steam at 37,000 players playing. Obviously it declined from initial release because the game doesn't have much replayability. Similar to ark, once you have played it once, you played it a billion times, aside from the order you catch your pals, there isn't any difference between runs, and unlike ark, there is no incentive to log on daily to verify you wern't raided, pals aren't starving etc. It's a game you play every once and awhile with your friends then ignore it for months. If anyone in their company expected infinite growth from a game with this kind of style, thats kind of on them.

[โ€“] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I agree with all of this; but if they did want to put more into it and make it into a franchise... I absolutely wouldn't say no.

Just make Pokemon but without all the shitty pretense.