Gaming

3118 readers

251 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

onlinepersona@programming.dev

Why don't idle games mine for crypto? (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world to c/gaming@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It feels like wasted power. You could at least be earning something off it. The creator can either take a cut if it's free or lump sum for paid.

I've seen a few idle games take up a lot CPU resources, not necessarily GPU so it had me wondering. Why not make it mine?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Because it would be inefficient and people don't like it when you use their computing power for your own gain. I should mention that there are known instances of this happening. A site being compromised and a JavaScript mining applet has been added to the site.

Also, Firefox blocks cryptominers by default.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

inefficient

Right... however ANY efficiency when already using a rig for an idle game is literally more efficient, hence why I wondered.

Also it wouldn't matter whether the mining benefits the owner or user. In reality if the user wants to try with the CPU, they'll be making $1 for every $20 wasted in power letting their computer idle hard. However that's still $19 rather than $20. You could at least give the creator the crypto rather than yourself if it's free which is kinda my point.

It's literally a case of I'd prefer nobody benefit rather than someone else.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You do know that PCs don't consume all the power when idle right?

I have a server with 2x800W power supplies and it idles at 110w. If I were to run a crypto miner on it my power bill will go up far more than the game creator will make.

The only winner in small scale crypto mining is the power company.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This isn't about a computer on idle... This is about a computer running a game non stop that people think is Idle... When it's not. It's often running a game doing massive number calculations regularly. Sometimes showing hundreds to thousands of separate things on the screen constantly.

I think a lot of the comments here just don't seem to understand how many resources an Idle game can actually take up lol.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

And if you mine crypto at the same time, it either uses even more resources, or the game runs slower.