this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1253 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9602 readers
1187 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Except the people who own the monster trucks never carry more than 1500 lbs and rarely take it on the highway.

[–] dorythefish@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A little off the topic, but sometimes I wonder if driving a rally car with a cage, 5 point seatbelts and a helmet will be more safe on a highway. Like it seems to me that it is safer, but will it actually be?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It would be better able to handle a severe crash, but pretty inconvenient and pointless.

You can put a full and spec cage, bucket seats, and a 5 point harness in any car. You don't need to go full racecar and take the interior out. You would need to wear a helmet, Hans device, and the full 5-point every time you drive the car because an otherwise survivable accident could kill you. You would also probably want a fire suppression system because a fire in a damaged car may not be escapable after you get hit without help.

You would be giving up airbags and visibility. Airbags can save you as much as a cage could. Visibility could prevent the accident in the first place. The cage and whatnot wouldn't save you from a catastrophic wreck, but a serious accident would be more survivable.

You might as well just not drive on the highway or don't get in a car at all if you are so concerned about your safety. Don't want a baby, use protection. Terrified about having a baby and don't think that protection is adequate, get sterilized or don't fuck.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’d be safer, but it wouldn’t be very comfortable. Rally cars have very barebones interiors to cut down on weight. You’d also need different tires and tuning.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except the people who own the monster trucks never carry more than 1500 lbs and rarely take it on the highway.

All of them? Like every single one?

[–] argueswithidiots@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Clearly there was some sort of global survey we aren't privy to.

[–] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You might be shocked to know that fitting a family of four plus vacation gear quickly approaches 1.5k.

Payload capacity includes how much people weigh. It’s not just how much you can throw in the bed.

[–] NinjaTeensy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's either a very heavy family or a lot of vacation gear! You would need all 4 people to be around 300lbs to start getting close.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's america, so it's not impossible

[–] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

A basic camping trip puts us right at the limit.