this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
250 points (94.0% liked)

Greentext

4392 readers
1325 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I believe the counter-argument to that would be that no act that is a result of mind control could be considered to be unequivocally good. The act of mind control itself is an inherent evil because it is forcing someone to do something they may not intrinsically desire without their consent. It's mental rape. Even in a scenario where the outcome is good, the ends wouldn't justify the means.

I'm not 100% sure how far this argument extends for me, but I find it generally more persuasive than the notion that "one good person" will be able to net more good than harm from the use of the power.

I will control you into watching 3h of skibidi toilet videos