this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
710 points (95.4% liked)

General Discussion

12067 readers
61 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (25 children)

So I get the idea that companies shouldn't be slaves to shareholders or the whims of a few people, but would the employees owning the company mean they are shouldering financial risk? Like if my company goes bankrupt I just lose my job, I am not responsible for covering their losses.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There would still be limited liability. Furthermore, they can share risks with investors, and self-insure against risk as well @general

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Insurance FTW; investors defeat the whole purpose.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why do investors defeat the whole purpose? @general

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do investors not own part of the company? They can hold the company hostage in exchange for their capital, even if they can't vote.

btw you seem to be outputting [@general](https://lemmy.world/c/general) at the bottom of your posts.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 0 points 3 months ago

Can you give an example in the case where investors hold non-voting preferred shares?

I'm not sure how cross posting works from Mastodon to Lemmy. I thought I had to do that to get boosted by the group

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)