this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
545 points (98.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

793 readers
159 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

~~Oof. Please don't make jokes that villainize HIPAA. We have few enough privacy laws, as it is.~~

HIPAA, applied properly, means her husband shouldn't have learned the details of her selected care, without her consent.

Edit: You were saying the same thing. I misunderstood.

[โ€“] Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What part of what i said villainized HIPAA?

Even if what you said is true, he just has to see the tweet for it to be a violation.

Data disclosure without authorization of the patient is a violation, and that doesn't matter who its disclosed to.

Source I work in medtech, i do yearly trainings on handling patient data, and its unlikely im related to any of them ๐Ÿ˜…

Edit: to clarify.. we are arguing about the doctor disclosing to the internet that this woman got an epidural, and whether or not that is a potential HIPAA violation right?

[โ€“] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

we are arguing about the doctor disclosing to the internet that this woman got an epidural, and whether or not that is a potential HIPAA violation right?

I missed that you meant if her doctor disclosed this. You're right. That's a wild HIPAA violation.