this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
249 points (94.6% liked)

Memes

45546 readers
1344 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Navarian@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

It's plausible that it's talking about electrical energy (Escalator, Lift etc) rather than physical. Though yeah I get where you're coming from, would bother me also.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Y'all are taking this sign too literally. It's pretty common to refer to electricity more generally as "energy."

[–] McJonalds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

3 common words for electricity and the most sensible one is the least used

[–] crazystuff@discuss.online 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn’t it “cal” vs “kcal” (kilocalories), as in 1000cal?

[–] 2bR02b@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

Yes. The “kilogram calorie” is just confidently incorrect shit.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Technically, yeah, 1 kilocalorie (kcal) = 1000 calories (cal), but in a lot of places (e.g. Americuh), we use the "Calorie" (with a capital C) in place of the kilocalorie.

In other words:

1 kilocalorie = 1 Calorie = 1000 calories
(1 kcal = 1 Cal = 1000 cal)

Yes, it is exactly as stupid as it sounds.

[–] crazystuff@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why they can’t have nice things

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trust me, I wish we made more sense. It would make my life a hell of a lot easier. Lol.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Not being bothered by stuff like this seems to be one of the reasons people start using terms that are actually wrong instead of just ambiguous. Like 2K to describe QHD.

I will never let that one go.

[–] jayemecee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, at the beginning I thought you were joking

I wish I were joking. Lol.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Correct, but more to use kJ (kiloJoule) wich is the right physical unit.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

I think they mean electrical energy

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Energy in = energy out.

This means even if you wanted to be environmentally conscious and take the stairs rather than using electrical energy to move the elevator, somewhere there is still energy being spent to create the food that's giving you that energy, and the electrical grid and elevator can do it at a way higher efficiency than you and the agricultural industry can, especially once multiple passengers are involved.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Kinda true, but not because of the formula. Elevators are really efficient now because of constant innovation. The actual dilemma is that you 'should' use elevators if they are already installed, but considering their construction they are way less energy efficient.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I suspect the actual energy cost of going up a few flights of stairs is entirely negligible compared to the subsequent reduction in energy usage for transportation of said human if their weight were reduced.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Except elevators are about 1000 times less efficient than a human body. Please do research before claiming nonsense.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah sign is clear as mud.

load more comments
view more: next ›