this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
534 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

4595 readers
323 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Isn't it because of the weapons? Without rifled barrels the bullet could come out flying all kinds of directions. If you were all hiding behind trees and other forms of cover, taking proper aim, the fighting would never end. Now if each side is just a wall of bullets going aginst a wall of people, you'd actually have a chance to hit something.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

rifles are old. They had them widely used by like the 16th century with advanced bullet geometry coming in at like the 17th.

Guns were pretty accurate. In like the 17th century the test for British riflemen involved hitting a 3 foot target at 900 yards for highest grade.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›