this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
67 points (97.2% liked)

Space

8671 readers
161 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nice visual breakdown of the estimated content of the universe from Visual Capital's website.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Space infographics like this are my jam. I could look at these all day, thanks for sharing :)

[โ€“] marmarama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool poster! Though I think dark energy (and possibly dark matter) will be seen by future generations like we see luminiferous ether or epicycles today.

[โ€“] TommyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed, I think the same. We just don't know what that stuff is yet. It could be a bunch of different things we haven't discovered because we can't measure it yet. Who knows. Fun to think about.

[โ€“] itsAsin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

under "Dark Energy" the caption reads, "theoretical form of energy.... behaves the opposite of gravity".

then why does it not also list gravity as a basic component of the universe?

[โ€“] 999666@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gravity is not the only basic component of the universe. What they are saying is that dark energy pushes things apart. It behaves in the opposite manner of the gravity we are familiar with.

[โ€“] McJonalds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

so if it doesnt behave like matter and just like an opposite force of gravity, why dont we call it a force?