this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
43 points (95.7% liked)

Public Health

375 readers
3 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Uhm, everyone has it in their blood.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think the point is that rich people don't care unless it effects them, so point out that it does.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do those chemicals also affect reptilians the same way?

It is in the ecosystem so certainly in reptiles.

That is a good point as a sad truth.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 9 months ago

I am glad of the publicity, maybe this will increase some anecdotal impact of telling the story, but they are way underselling it. Everyone has forever chemicals in their blood. Eskimos and Australian aborigines have forever chemicals in their blood. People tried to do a comparative study to analyze the health impacts, and they literally couldn't find any population anywhere on earth even after quite a bit of searching that didn't have significant amounts of forever chemicals in their blood.