this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
123 points (94.2% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2805 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US has reimposed economic sanctions against a Venezuelan state-owned mining company and says it could go on to reimpose further sanctions on the country’s oil and gas sector after Venezuela’s Supreme Court barred main opposition candidate Maria Corina Machado from running for president last week.

The US Treasury on Monday revoked General License 43, which had authorized dealings with mining conglomerate CVG-Minerven. The Treasury said US companies have until February 13 to wind down transactions that were previously authorized by that license.

While US economic sanctions against the mining company are unlikely to cause significant damage to the Venezuelan economy, the US State Department has crucially signaled it intends to renew oil and gas sanctions from April 18, if there’s no progress between Venezuela’s authoritarian president Nicolas Maduro and the opposition “particularly on allowing all presidential candidates to compete in this year’s elections,” it said in a statement.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She wants to privatize huge swathes of the Venezuelan government and wants a Milei style capitalist "shock therapy". She's on record not only stating that helping poor people is bad, but defends the statement. She'd make a bad situation for the Venezuelan people far, far worse. Of fucking course she should be barred from running. The US should stop intervening in South America.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Barring people from running because you dislike their platform is as fascist as it gets.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What definition of fascism is it that prevents fascists from running for president?

[–] Xin_shill@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

There is no need to be tolerant of the intolerant. They don’t abide by the social contract and don’t reap the benefits of it.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Should Trump be barred from running?

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Yes, because he violated his oath of office

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And that includes upholding the constitution. Not helping poor people kind of violates that in spirit right?

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Many believe that your so called help for the poor makes things worse for the poor in the long run. You don't have to agree with their position, but you need to accept that they are reasonable people looking at facts and coming up with a different interpretation.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 5 points 9 months ago

helping the poor actually harms the poor

That's supposed to be a reasonable argument worth entertaining? By that logic, trump violated the Constitution to protect! Do we have to accept that as a reasonable position too, even if we don't agree?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well not only does he have shitty policies, he did also attempt a coup. Which is why he should be barred from running.

Stop attempting the false equivalence, it's not working.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Her party tried to rob a military arsenal, she was charged with a conspiracy and corruption, and so she can't run. It went through their courts. It all seems legal, considering people in the US can't run for similar reasons. It might be corrupt, idk, but the US doesn't have a leg to stand on with corrupt courts. Why sanction other countries, which always affects the regular citizens, for this stuff we can't even figure out ourselves?

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes, because he's a traitor, fraud, and criminal. Your question is not quite the gotcha you think it is.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It wasn't intended as a gotcha. I wanted a baseline to know whether the conversation was worth continuing.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 9 months ago

You literally just proved it is exactly the gotcha you think it is lol

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah more sanctions for trouble areas. Surely this will help our immigration problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you're a victim of a government we deem undemocratic? We'll further suffocate you economically then!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I don't think they should have barred Machado from running, but I also don't think the US should sanction them over it. American meddling never improves this sort of situation, especially when in the form of hurting a country's economy.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago (11 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez described the move as “blackmail” on Tuesday, warning that Caracas would stop cooperating in repatriation flights for Venezuelan migrants from the US if Washington’s “economic aggression” intensifies.

In October, the Biden administration lifted general economic sanctions targeting Venezuela’s mining and oil industries, in support of an agreement struck in Barbados between Maduro and the opposition to hold free and fair elections in 2024.

Earlier on Monday, White House’s spokesperson John Kirby had said Maduro had until April to return to the negotiating table and commit to what was agreed last year, including holding free elections where all candidates are allowed to run, or sanctions could be reimposed.

It also has the potential to impact the US domestic gas market because several US companies, including Chevron, operate in Venezuela and Venezuelan crude is regularly exported to refineries in the US Gulf Coast, data from the US Energy Information Administration show.

In an interview with CNN’s Isa Soares on Tuesday, Machado warned millions more Venezuelans could flee the country if Maduro doesn’t comply with commitments to hold free elections.

Machado also commented on Rodríguez’s warning that Venezuela could stop cooperating on repatriation flights, saying, “You can imagine that it breaks my heart to see our people being used in such a hard and unlawful way.


The original article contains 555 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 months ago

Expect more Venezuelans crossing the border then.

load more comments
view more: next ›