this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

A detailed look at the timeline behind Meta's interactions with the Fediverse, how different parts of the network have reacted, and some insights on where things might be going.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] African_Grey@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Keep. Meta. OUT. They will 100% try to EEE the fediverse.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I find the argument that luring users from Meta is even feasible to be specious to the degree of suspicion. Can a nice burger joint lure customers away from McDonalds? No, actually, they cannot, this has been proven time and again for decades. The people want the garbage.

As a result of this, the argument reeks to me of, at very least, ignorance. But if the person sounds intelligent enough to already understand this, then I myself would begin to wonder about bad faith and attempting to sabotage the service intentionally by handing it to Zuck on a silver platter.

Us? Powerful enough to lure from Meta? What the fuck can these people be smoking?

[–] laurens@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

In this context its worth noting that Pixelfed recently implemented post import from Instagram. People are working on ways to make this easier.

[–] Machinist3359@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By extension, this is why I don't think defederating with Meta is an effective strategy. Like gourmet burger restaurants refusing to be on the same block as McDonalds.

Meta will get the big names as they exit Twitter, and become borderline necessary to federate with-- assuming updates from years of state, artists, activists, etc are of any interest to people considering your instance.

This is inevitable. I think the only discussion is how we have a vibrant enough community that EEE becomes less viable.

It's something we failed to do with email. I suspect the answer is approximate to far easier instance hosting, to increase the number of instances and make a federation whitelist unviable for Meta

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

By extension, this is why I don't think defederating with Meta is an effective strategy. Like gourmet burger restaurants refusing to be on the same block as McDonalds.

It's not a question of whether fediverse and Meta get defederated, it's a question of when. Even if we don't defederate with them the history teaches us that eventually, when they get a monopoly on the content and users here, they're gonna shut down the rest. It seems the only choice is whether we want to do it while meta is still growing, or wait until it becomes strong (or hope it falls apart and dies).