It's a bit funny to me that even when hosted on lemmy*.world*, the "news" community is exclusively for American news and the "politics" community is exclusively for American politics.
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
72 points (90.9% liked)
politics
19097 readers
3568 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, that was a bit of a head scratcher for me too, I wasn't around when it was all set up. "US News", "World News", "US Politics", "World Politics" would have been clearer.
Based on when the Admins are most active, I don't think they're US based, but then I'm writing this at 5 AM Pacific time so WTF do I know? LOL.
Lordy did people have their panties in a bunch over that discussion.
It's the reddit equivalent
I wouldn't be against a system where news was labeled by region or country in the headline, but I think it's too late because there's already World News.
I saw people doing this sometimes, but then it stopped. I liked it too, as it seemed like a good compromise.
Seems like drama to not have world politics in an instance called world.
Why not make USPolitics?
But USA numba 1. /s
The default US-ism is frustrating indeed.
If you want to check out the world partner to this politics community there is https://lemmy.world/c/globalpolitics
That doesn't negate what I said.
true and while this community was allowing world politics I was posting here instead of in globalpolitics but now that the politics mods have reverted that rule I am following it
Your transparency, as always, is appreciated!
I missed the drama. What were the unilateral rules they enacted?
#1 being that Politics should be open to global politics and not just US politics.
That decision came out of nowhere, with no discussion. In a year that's going to be dominated by US politics...
It did seem like that rule was added suddenly when mightbe announced it.
Lund, all my communication to you were in the DMs, please show everyone the messages where I am hostile to you, because I don't remember sending anything of that nature to you, while you are making it sound like I am hurling insults and slurs at you which simply was not true.
For little_cow, I was frustrated with their actions with the MBFC controversy that both you and them were involved in, I was trying to find a way to handle it delicately, but you two seem intent on causing as much drama with that as possible.
Didn't your top mod tell you I was discussing future rule changes with them in the DMs? I told you before that I'm busy with work, talk to me in the DMs, if you want me to get on Discord for important things, schedule a time, I can't spend all day there.
It is really telling to me then that you worked with YoBuckStopsHere for ~6 months, while he said horrid things around our instance as a mod, like "dropping white phosphorus on civilians isn't a war crime", "a girl who is a victim of suicide doesn't deserve sympathy", or when he was banned from startrek.website for being a homophobe and the embarrassing events that followed, and you removed me in 2 weeks for daring to take feedback for improvement, actually enforcing the rules you set up, and not wanting to be a part of the powermod mess that caused this whole thing to begin with.
Not engaging in even more drama. We discussed it, compared notes, Admins agreed, that was the end of it.
If you didn't want to engage in more drama, then why did you title this post "new mod drama", instead of just "admin action and mod removal" for YoBuck?
Because YoBuck wasn't immediately following another mod removal. ;)