this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
56 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

34989 readers
381 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In earlier eras, the manifesto was an important organ of radical political and aesthetic movements; prominent examples in the history of the genre include of course those of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, André Breton, or, more recent, the Dogme 95 group. These days, in which radical political ideas of the Left or the Right have only recently begun to become mainstream again, it is unsurprising that the manifesto seems to be a historical relic.

But the genre received a new entry with Marc Andreessen’s “Techno-Optimist Manifesto,” published last October on the website of Andreessen Horowitz, perhaps the very bluest of Silicon Valley’s blue-chip venture capital firms. That apparently radical manifestos are now being produced by billionaire technocapitalists might be cause for alarm among our nineteenth- and twentieth-century ancestors. But it really shouldn’t surprise us, at least those who pay attention to the kind of rhetoric coming regularly from Sand Hill Road and its environs. Hardly content with the accumulation of fortunes unprecedented in history and their resulting political power, a small number of our new ruling overlords clearly want to be taken seriously as thinkers, too...

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This dude and his wannabe Big Think needs to just shut the fuck up. He is antithema to everything technology would naturally bring us. It should be a good thing to unshackle us from labor. Him and his slimy ilk have held us back for the last fourty years just to ensure the pipelines are directed to their wallets and ideologies. I wholeheartedly believe that if he and his friend group vaporized into the unknown tomorrow the world would become a better place.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I really enjoyed reading this. But you all do know that reading this and nodding while not forming or joining a political movement to get those scumbags convicted for making everyone else suffer is wasted potential, right? Can someone please link a global movement against megacorps and billionaires? I would sign up in a heartbeat.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What I hate the most is that they are literally stealing science, technology and progress to enforce their techno-feudalism.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

More eloquent than i could ever hope.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I just thought of a better word for their ideology: techno-feudalism. They are not optimist or humanist, they crave for power and controle.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We agree with Paul Collier when he says, “Economic growth is not a cure-all, but lack of growth is a kill-all.”

We believe everything good is downstream of growth.

So Techno-Optimism is just a minor flavor of Neoliberalism I guess?

[–] CurlyWurlies4All 3 points 10 months ago

always-was-astrononaut-meme.png

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That's unfortunate. I consider myself a technooptimist, but I am anything but a believer of liberalism or capitalism.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

They want to rule as god-kings.

So they're acting like god-kings.

Pretty soon, people will elevate them to god-kings because power perceived is power achieved.