All this really shows is how good Hamilton's first year was. Would be good to see this adjusted to % of total available points.
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
42 points (92.0% liked)
Formula 1
9048 readers
135 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Adjusted for inflation, Lewis' 2007 season would have been worth 249 points. Which is even more insane.
So then what are Alonso's adjusted points?
Sadly, 1 for a single P10 (in a shitbox Minardi tho)
We would have to adjust the scaling of the chart to fit everybody else if percentage of available points was taken
Seriously how much does this really mean? Yeah the better drivers tend to be near the top. There just seems to be too many variables in F1 to make much of this.
Yeah this just shows that McLaren are the only top team to field rookies and Force India had a decent year in 2017.
He was in a car that should have won the drivers championship, how many other rookies have found themselves in that position?
Alonso pretty mad at these results. π€£