this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
172 points (97.8% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2476 readers
336 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] BoxerDevil@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The thing is, they have no duty to stop him before he kills someone.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

In the US, they don't even have a duty to stop him after he kills someone. Police have no duty or requirement to protect civilians.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I know. My point still stands.

[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They have no duty to stop him even as he is killing someone

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

No duty, even after he's killed a few people, and working to kill more.

Maybe we should re-label mass shooters to something like "climate protesters". Those are words that always receive a massive police response.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They don't appear to have any duties at all.

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Their only duties are administrative. Draw lines with chalk, collect evidence, fill out paperwork.

The only person who can be trusted to defend your life is yourself, unfortunately.

No legal* duty

[–] if_only@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Of course. He wasn't an innocent black man, he could've been dangerous! Best leave him be.

Seriously, I'm of the opinion that if cops are just going to shoot at dogs and innocent civilians and ignore shit like this then we would be better off (and safer) without cops.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What exactly would you say you do here?

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Definitely not being a "people person"