this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
271 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9642 readers
347 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's almost like car infrastructure has dogshit durability and longevity and is a massive money sink compared to more efficient transportation infrastructures!

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's also disingenuous lies. This money is being spent over 11 years so is more in the realm of £750m a year.

This is also a classic trick of the Conservative government and is why the NHS is also in a mess: they steal money from capital investment budgets and use it to spend on day-to-day operational stuff.

In the NHS they took money from the capital budget and diverted it to day to day spending, claiming it as "new money". It was an increase in day-to-day spending but it was not new money. Instead NHS trusts now have big backlogs of equipment and buildings needing replacement and being used beyond intended life cycle because the money was stolen.

Pot hole repair is day-to-day road maintenance, not infrastructure or capital investment. HS2 was a new capital project. This is just more bullshit lies by the government and a huge issue here is how shit journalism is now. The BBC hasn't questioned this spending pledge at all, instead it's posted a bullshit superficial article on potholes.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a brit, but shit like this makes me want to start putting potholes in the heads of politicians

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

he needs a trip to Dallas

[–] li10@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s so funny how the conservatives had a little bit of success in one constituency that didn’t want ULEZ, and they’ve now made “end the war on motorists” one of their main goals…

“Throw shit, see what sticks” really sums up the conservative government under Sunak.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Their entire platform is based on us-vs-them mentality, hate, not to mention some generous donations from UK petroleum and automobile corporations. “End the war on motorists” is right up their alley.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this guy needs a trip to Dallas

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He'll probably enjoy it and take plenty of notes

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

on a sunny afternoon....

... in a convertible

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've heard a couple people claim they need an SUV because the roads are so bad. And I admit that driving on a bad road in a normal sized car is not fun. But maybe we'd have more money for fixing roads if we had fewer roads.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago

Roads are bad > get bigger car > makes roads worse

If we follow this loop then everyone’s gonna be driving monster trucks…

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i question whether it even feels better, since it's a bigger heavier vehicle which means there's even more weight to slam down onto the suspension..

i'd go for as small and light of a vehicle as possible with the best suspension available, that should comparatively float over potholes

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Smaller vehicles tend to have smaller tire diameters. This leta the vehicles sink deeper into the potholes compared to larger tires that are better able to bridge across it.

Maybe if we built some kind of road with rails on it we could avoid the potholes....

[–] blazera@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"For too long politicians have shied away from taking the right long-term decisions to make life easier for hardworking families"

Im sure 100 years from now we'll be looking at decisions like this fondly. When AC malfunctions are death sentences.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Remember that episode of Doctor Who where everyone was trapped on the highway, going round and round for centuries? It'll be like that.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Keep the people miserable to keep them in line basically. Dangle promises above their heads so they always have false hope.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Oh common, bring cameron already" some british probably