this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
388 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3440 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And I think 'scathing' is an accurate and non-hyperbolic headline for once:

A charitable explanation of your correspondence is that you are ignorant of the United States and Georgia Constitutions and codes. A more troubling explanation is that you are abusing your authority as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary to attempt to obstruct and interfere with a Georgia criminal prosecution. See O.C.G.A. § 16-10-24. Indeed, you confessed to this motivation on Mark Levin’s September 10, 2023, show: when discussing one of my office’s active prosecutions. you boasted, “We’re trying to get all the answers, but we’re trying to stop this stuff as well” (emphasis added). While you may enjoy immunity under the United States Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, that does not make your behavior any less offensive to the rule of law.

As the person chosen by the citizens of Fulton County to be their District Attorney, I serve them, and my team and I are exceptionally busy. We have already written a letter—which I have attached again for your reference–explaining why the legal positions you advance are meritless. Nothing you’ve said in your latest letter changes that fact. As I have explained, your requests implicate significant. well recognized confidentiality interests related to an ongoing criminal matter, as well as serious constitutional concerns regarding federalism and separation of powers.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We have already written a letter—which I have attached again for your reference–explaining why the legal positions you advance are meritless. Nothing you’ve said in your latest letter

As I have explained, your requests implicate significant. well recognized confidentiality interests related to an ongoing criminal matter

Oh shit, she just "per my previous email"-ed Gymbo fucking twice!

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It gets even better if you read the letter itself, linked in the article.

My attached prior letter provided you with four noble suggested uses of your authority as Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee: (1) enhancing funding for victim-witness advocates; (2) expanding funding for testing all rape kits; (3) supporting the Credible Messengers program, which helps to turn around children in trouble with the criminal justice system; and (4) ensuring adequate funding to support state crime labs, which test for drugs like Fentanyl. I would encourage you to focus your attention on those issues, which would make life better for the American people.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

It's just layers up on layers of "per my previous email".

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A Republican who doesn't understand how our government works or wants to undermine it's essential functions? Say it ain't so!

Probably damaged his brain sticking his fingers in his ears so hard trying not hear the rape and sexual abuse.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

I can't believe that the leadership of the House of Representatives has come down to a race between a guy who covered up for a rapist and a guy who calls himself David Duke without the baggage.

Bold of her to assume he can read.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

"Dear Gym,

This is not an educational institution's athletics department where you can help cover up sexual abuse to prevent investigations by law enforcement."

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Good for her. Jordan doesn't have a leg to stand on thanks to the extremely basic principle of federalism that gives our 50 states huge leeway over how and when to prosecute crimes in their state. The idea that the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee would reach down from his national duties to actively try to investigate and derail the ongoing work of a county prosecutor is just repellent to the very framework, laws, and concept of the Union of separately-empowered states that is our country.

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

While you may enjoy immunity under the United States Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, that does not make your behavior any less offensive to the rule of law.

In other words, "the ONLY reason I haven't indicted your ass for obstruction is that you'll spend months on appeals all the way to SCOTUS trying to claim your obstruction is part of your duties in Congress, and you aren't worth my time right now, bitch."

I'd actually like to see her bring the charge and let judges bend themselves into pretzels trying to rationalize how a Congress member's incessant interference with a state case qualifies under the speech and debate clause's protection.

[–] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

If there's one thing Ol' Gym knows it's ABUSE!

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Watch him twist that last line into “Fani wilis questions the validity of the constitution “ and the hogs eat it up

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Pound sand ha, I'd love to see this to become norm instead of 'slam'.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wait, doesn't she know her place?