this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
221 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is a pretty big one, and it chips away a big stupid argument that Trump and the right wing has been making. That being, “the left wants to invest in EVs and, EV manufacturing isn’t as good for American workers.”

Which is technically true, but it’s true because there are less unions in EV manufacturing, and that makes the jobs shittier. And America’s right is the corporate mouthpiece for killing unions.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is a pretty big one, and it chips away a big stupid argument that Trump and the right wing has been making. That being, “the left wants to invest in EVs and, EV manufacturing isn’t as good for American workers.”

It's not just Trump and the right wing. There was an interview that Shawn Fain had with PBS where the interviewer kept trying to paint unions as anti-EV.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This? https://www.pbs.org/video/countering-china-1695752854/

Seems like pretty reasonable questioning. She asked for his response to what Trump was blabbing about.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There are also fewer parts to EVs, which means fewer parts to manufacture. Of course, the implication of that being an argument against EVs is that we should keep driving Rube Goldberg machines with more points of failure because that's someone's job - but nobody would bat an eye at having a robot do that job if it's possible to.

[–] brennansv@sfba.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@tintory This better just be the start. These workers should understand there won’t be as many jobs in building EVs and making batteries or maintenance at dealerships. Instead there will be new jobs in building and maintening solar farms and charging stations all over the country. States should be running job retraining programs to prepare the workforce. Becoming a skilled electrician will make a very good career. Buildings and homes are also being converted to use electricity more and oil products less. It is better to start sooner than later.

[–] tintory@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I used to build maintenance apps for a logistics company, and one thing I learn is that you should be suprise on what kind of jobs will pop up