this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
195 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump was a quiet presence inside court, but outside he said ‘deranged’ judge overseeing case ‘should be out of office’

Not many defendants would dare to brand the judge overseeing their case “deranged”, call for them to be kicked out of office and dismiss the suit against them as a “witch-hunt”. Not many defendants are Donald Trump.

On the first day of a civil fraud case that could decide the future of his business career, Trump cut an angry, uncomfortable figure. “This is a judge that should be out of office,” he told reporters as the court broke for lunch. “This is a judge that some people say could be charged criminally for what he’s doing.”

In court, in a navy suit and light blue tie, Trump was a quieter presence. Hunched at times and conferring with his lawyers, he mostly listened quietly as lawyers for the New York attorney general outlined their case.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ofk12@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He's a fucking baggy minge that cunt.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand your comment, but I'm behind the general spirit of it!

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

He means “steak drapes”

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where can one learn to speak like this? I would pay for this class.

No idea if this is true but it sounds like something straight out of Trainspotting… I can almost hear the accent in my head. No offense hopefully, I’m just a dumb Yank.

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're thinking Lock Stock or Snatch, more like it.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Snatch is the only movie I pirated and was not disappointed when it wasn't a porno.

[–] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Beef Curtains...

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is really stupid to say things about the judgeb in a jury trial.

It is incredibly stupid to say things about the judge in a bench trial.

[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is, unless as every other time before, Trump faces no consequences for his actions.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's attempting to tilt the judge to appeal for a mistrial

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Good thing most judges are old enough and wise enough to see his grandstanding for what it is and not give it to him.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only stupid when you have to face any consequences

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I really hope, this time, tRump faces the find out part of fuck around and find out.

[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get it; he’s rich, really rich…or was…maybe…idk…but why is it so hard to understand that he is US Citizen (SSN) #999-99-9999. Treat him like literally every other person, if you’d hold them in contempt, the same goes for Trump.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Right, damn his supporters and bootlickers. All I want is for them to do their fucking jobs. Who cares about his title, past our present. Just. Do. Your. Fucking. Job.

[–] redmoon@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he hasn't learned what "don't piss off the judge" means by now his ass is grass. Grass that smells like shit.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

His lawyers fucked up and the judge, not a jury, gets to decide liability. Really stupid to attack the person in charge of the ultimate outcome of your case.

[–] Naja_kaouthia@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know, every time he says something dumb I think to myself, “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard”. I then wait about a week,tops and he manages to say something dumber-er. Amazing.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

He said dumber shit on the daily.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shit-talking the judge always does great things for your prospects in court.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Especially when that judge is your jury, too!

[–] TRBoom@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?

[–] Naja_kaouthia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Very Henry II of you.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Bold move, Cotton

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Not many defendants would dare to brand the judge overseeing their case “deranged”, call for them to be kicked out of office and dismiss the suit against them as a “witch-hunt”.

On the first day of a civil fraud case that could decide the future of his business career, Trump cut an angry, uncomfortable figure.

In a hushed courtroom with secret service agents posted on all sides of the room, Trump sat directly facing the New York judge Arthur Engoron.

As the judge and the lawyers conferred, Trump gave the occasional scoff and eye roll but the fireworks were saved for outside the court.

After a three-year investigation the attorney general Letitia James, also present, has accused Trump and his sons of “grossly inflating” the value of the properties in order to secure business loans.

Habba also told the judge that the attorney general’s office had brought the case forward on political motivations, that people are mad that Trump’s real estate brand is so successful.


The original article contains 940 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)