this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
55 points (83.1% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2513 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  1. Accuse a person with no police involvement
  2. Accused person states their innocence
  3. Media storm breathless that accused person claims to be innocent.
  4. Accused persons fans and supporters, call for more data, call for a criminal investigation to clear this up.
  5. Media storm breathless that people who support the accused would want a proper investigation.
  6. Companies affiliated with accused person, drop accused person for fear of bad publicity.
  7. Accused person supporters now outraged that the accused is being punished extrajudicially
  8. Accusers supporters outraged that people are outraged that somebody's being punished extra judicially
  9. Optional - criminal investigation starts ...

At every step along the way there's great drama, and opportunity for media coverage, to get clicks. Was this a coordinated media attack? Absolutely. The newspaper and the television show came out on the same day at about the same time referencing each other. That's coordination.

Are the accusations without merit? We don't know, we need the criminal investigation to happen in order for us to know.

[–] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least the 70s show guy is out of the news cycle.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago

Imagine thinking celebrities behaving badly was news.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From my personal perspective, he probably did it. But I just get triggered by news articles being flummixed the people are reacting to news articles.

The outrage drama cycle is exactly what they're trying to create. Them getting outraged at people acting out at their outrage is outrageous

[–] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you aren’t the alleged victim, or personally know the alleged victim, kindly shut the fuck up as you have no idea beyond your personal biases.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gatekeeping opinions is not the way to build a open discourse.

[–] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And popping off ignorant opinions is how we get to mob justice

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

And making sweeping generalizations about virtual scenarios is how thoughts get terminated.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

And writing stories about the uninformed opinions of anonymous strangers on the internet isn't journalism.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Arguing about theoretical controversy is the foundation of online discourse.

For instance, did you know that Leonardo DiCaprio once ate a hotdog without mustard, in public, and then farted, and blamed it on the hotdog vendor? True story, I heard it from a friend who listens to a podcast about celebrity gossip. And it's DISGUSTING.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago

Ohh that DiCaprio! What a card

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I feel the same way about the coach at MSU (Michigan State University) they said they are firing him before he can even defend himself. And it was a phone call, dude lost his job over a phone call that she could have just ended and blocked him.

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't care about "celebrities". I'm back in my workshop. Bye.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, I still can't be arsed to give a shit about Russell Brand, and don't understand why anybody would.

[–] DarienGS@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This is the sanest Spectator article I've ever read.