this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
135 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38969 readers
3466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Putin: So about those weapons

Kim: Yes we would love more weapons

Putin: awkward silence........

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, that's the way I thought this headline was going

[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing says desperation like going to a country even more sanctioned to buy some weapons.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 25 points 1 year ago

Asking for help from the worlds most garbage country, an absolute sign things are going well.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...but do we have a missile powerful enough to take out a target at both ends of Putin's table?

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I heard drones are all the rage now.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


North Korea's Kim Jong Un plans to travel to Russia this month to meet President Vladimir Putin, a US official has told the BBC's US partner CBS.

Weapons on display at the meeting included the Hwasong intercontinental ballistic missile, believed to be the country's first ICBM to use solid propellants.

There is concern both in Washington and in Seoul about what North Korea would get in return for such a deal, which may result in increased military cooperation between the two countries in Asia.

The newspaper's diplomatic correspondent, Edward Wong, told BBC News channel that an advance team of North Korean officials had travelled to Vladivostok and Moscow late last month.

They "included security officers who deal with the protocol surrounding travel of the leadership, so that was a strong sign for officials looking at this", Wong said.

That meeting came just months after a summit in Vietnam between Mr Kim and then-US President Donald Trump had failed to make progress on denuclearising the Korean peninsula.


The original article contains 718 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best thing about buying weapons from north Korea is all the artillery pieces come with oxen for maximum battlefield mobility.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

But they only shoot south, Russian can't use those

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As viewers of Perun Will know, North Korea has one of the largest stockpiles of artillery shells in the world. Russia uses artillery at a prodigious rate, and can't keep up with its usage.

So Russia gets the older stockpile of artillery shells, which we knew they're going to get, the worrisome thing is what is North Korea going to get from the deal?

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If they were smart, food and fuel.

Since they're NK, probably personal enrichment for Kim, and maybe some cold war era nukes.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago

Money sure. Probably access to energy reserves, maybe even a pipeline for natural gas to North Korea. But more likely military technology

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which currency?

Rubles are pretty useless at the moment, and for the foreseeable future.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I’m guessing yuan could work for both of them?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

North Korea has one of the largest stockpiles of artillery shells in the world.

I'm curious how well preserved those shells are. Russia itself was sending shells to the front that were non-functional because of poor storage. I wonder if North Korea did a better job of preservation.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's going to be a low percentage, but that's better than nothing, maybe it isn't better than nothing I don't know. The artillery crews aren't going to be super happy about old ammunition I'm sure.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There has also been a history of North Korea screwing over Russia with regards to arms. Recently North Korea hacked Russia to steal hypersonic missile designs and data. Even if the overall percentage of ruined shells is lower, North Korea could choose to send ALL of the ruined ones to Russia with a number good shells, and charge Russia as though all of them are good.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

Considering they're the only game in town, I expect their price to be very dear.

[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

could get 2 of them done for the price of one?

load more comments
view more: next ›