this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
49 points (98.0% liked)

Formula 1

9070 readers
41 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] espentan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

"Crash". Unintentional clash. Definitely should've, could've been avoided, but hardly cause for concern, in my humble opinion.

[–] lawgicau@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago

They shouldn't have been near each other. Lando was given the preferential undercut strategy despite being behind on track. Oscar had a slower stop and still almost stayed ahead. If Oscar was pitted first like you would hope they don't end up next to each other at T1.

[–] Hillock@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

I totally understand Piastri trying to put himself in front in the situation. F1 is so unfrogiving towards rookies and drivers in general. If Piastri would let Norris pass everytime just because Norris is the #1 driver, many teams would dismiss him as potential #1 driver in the future because "he lacks the fighting spirit". Given his recent performance there is no doubt he will get a new contract somewhere even if he were to fall out with McLaren. So he only stands to lose by staying too passive.

If McLaren followed their own philosphy of "The Team above all" they would have pitted Piastri first. There was no reason to pit Norris first. They didn't have to protect against an undercut from someone else. And if Norris actually were faster and held up by Piastri the undercut would have worked.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened? I missed that somehow, saw only the second half of the race.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On lap 24 of 51, the McLaren pair came to blows at the first chicane as rookie racer Piastri re-joined the Monza track alongside earlier-stopping Norris in a dice for what was then 10th position.

With Piastri on the inside at the tight first apex, the front-right of the Australian’s MCL60 glanced his team-mate's sidepod. There was no major damage and both escaped punishment from the stewards.

Nevertheless, team boss Stella branded the incident as “unacceptable”. He said: “There should never ever be contact between two McLaren cars.

“There was a contact, which doesn’t fit the way we go racing at McLaren.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

…while we were watching two Ferrari fighting each other towards the end, and everyone was asking himself whether they would shoot each other off the track…