this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
911 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley on Thursday called the Senate “the most privileged nursing home in the country.”

In response to a question about Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) apparently freezing up on Wednesday while taking questions in Covington, Ky., Haley said on Fox News that the Kentucky senator has “done some great things, and he deserves credit,” but emphasized that “you have to know when to leave.”

““No one should feel good about seeing that any more than we should feel good about seeing Dianne Feinstein, any more than we should feel good about a lot of what’s happening or seeing Joe Biden’s decline,” Haley said. “What I will say is, right now, the Senate is the most privileged nursing home in the country.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ATQ@lemm.ee 151 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Well what do you know? I agree with Nikki Haley on something.

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

She ain't wrong (huuuge edit: ON THIS SUBJECT QUOTE)

[–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

The average age IS pretty fucking high. Fresh blood would be good, methinks. Most of these codgers are career politicians who’ve just cling to their positions for decades

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be careful, she used this line to accuse Biden of being declined like McConnell or Feinstein

[–] ATQ@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden over Trump was an easy vote. But Biden wasn’t exactly my first pick. There’s something fucked up about people who would be considered absolutely unemployable in any other profession clinging to power and running the country like it was 40 years ago. This applies all around.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah admittedly my first pick was also ancient, but he was the leftest

[–] jdf038@mander.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with you and her as far as health care but I doubt McConnell and Feinstein are actually enjoying their golden years. You'd expect a nursing home to help with that part.

Oh well I don't feel sorry for them as they are power addicted idiots.

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They look miserable. But I don't know if Feinstein is power addicted at this point and not just entirely confused and pupeteered by other people. I wonder what she would answer if you asked her how old she is right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 121 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Joe Biden's decline? Look, I don't like having great-grandpa in the Whitehouse or Senate or Supreme Court, and I think we should have an age limit, but there's no need to invent a "decline" to make a point.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And I'd press her on naming one "great thing" McConnell has done...

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on perspective. If you're a fascist, that list is quite long.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

This. He denied Garland to the Supreme Court. Then without a shred of shame shoved Barret through. He blatantly shat on a precedent he himself set. His supporters don't care. They think this is good.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

His unwavering support for Ukraine.

Or if you want a dish that is well chilled but much spicier look no further than the Anti-Corruption Act of 1988

Look at the Sponsor, then look at the Co-Sponsor, then read the Summary. Look familiar? 😉

[–] Heisme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sad that “one great thing” now equates to doing their fucking job.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, can you think of anything that would qualify as "one great thing" that doesn't fall under the purview of "doing their job"?

Like, I don't think the expectation is that he would have run into a burning building to save some starving orphans?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

In her mind, the blocking of Merrick Garland.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Fuck Haley, but she is right about the nursing home part. But there is a fix that Americans don't want to admit - their voting - or LACK OF voting - is what is keeping these elderly Senators in office. Of course she is an opportunist twat that is only saying this to try to hit at Biden indirectly by bringing up the age issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn if she's not right about that.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

She is but I can't help but think she has unstated motives for saying it.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

Person trying to boost popularity says popular thing.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Standard GOP tactic

  1. Complain about how bad the government is
  2. Get elected
  3. Make government worse
  4. Back to step 1
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually hate Nikki Haley. Her policies, ideas, and alignment are all wrong. But she is somehow self-aware enough to realize that a bunch of old people are running our country right now, and how detrimental that is.

Her miscalculation is that she believes young voters will refill the GOP coffers with people as crazy as she is. Won't happen.

[–] dublet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A heartbreaking story is currently unfolding that’s sure to have devastating ramifications for years to come. Just moments ago, without any warning, the worst person you know just made a great point.

https://clickhole.com/heartbreaking-the-worst-person-you-know-just-made-a-gr-1825121606/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's not wrong, she's just an asshole

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Politician reads the room and adopts the most lukewarm, obvious, low-hanging-fruit take in an effort to score free publicity. Damn, really raising the bar here.

[–] phej@reddthat.com 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

100%. We need age and term limits for all elected offices.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 26 points 1 year ago (7 children)

We don't want a Senate with 60 Ted Cruz's. I agree with the other guy. Money reform first. Then we can consider age and term limits.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] if_you_can_keep_it@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess the question is: what problem are you trying to solve by instituting age limits and term limits?

If the issue is the advantage of incumbency and having entrenched politicians with large campaign funding operations behind them, then maybe a better way of solving this would be campaign finance reform that prevents private dollar donations from non-individuals and heavy restrictions on how much an individual can contribute.

All that term limits and age limits in Congress would achieve is setting an artificial barrier for those who do the job well while setting up a new group of people to benefit from the legislature's dysfunction.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it be easier to "get your guy" in if they pushed rotate people through the Senate. Its not like either situation is good. But I don't trust Nikki for shit. I still think she's a stooge

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Power corrupts. The end. The longer you are in positions of power, the more exposure you have to influence from money. It needs to be a revolving door for every elected official. Get in. Do good things. Lead by example. Move on up or gtfo.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like that misses a lot about how politics work. Someone just getting into office is often far too ineffective for us to allow our system to be run by first and second term legislators. First term legislators are often fairly useless because they are still learning the job. I'm not saying there is no solution to that, but it would have to be coupled with massive reform around the support mechanisms for our legislatures. You think the federal government is slow moving now, just wait until everyone in office has no idea how to do their job.

Edit: Also as others have pointed out, you'd also be terming very competent legislators along with the corrupt ones. I think people overestimate the amount of corruption in the legislative branch, due to the media creating a confirmation bias. For every evil corrupt piece of shit, there are 5-10 people you've never heard of just doing what they think is right (even if you don't agree with them).

Edit2: maybe a better solution is a dementia/Alzheimer's in person test given to all legislators past 65 every year, evaluated by a 3 doctor panel. If you fail the test, you're legally prevented from running and forced to resign if in office. If removed the political party impacted gets to appoint the replacement, otherwise if there is no political party (true independent) the executive branch of that state gets to appoint replacement.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Just look at Bernie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haley said on Fox News that the Kentucky senator has “done some great things, and he deserves credit,”

Examples?

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 year ago

Republicans consider damage to the country a great thing.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For one, he destroyed the legitimacy of the federal judiciary & supreme court. Which is terrible, but great. Like Voldemort.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who cares what this monster says? Yall want federal abortion bans, lgbt bans, more environmental damage and worse access to medicare?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

She’s a fucking traitor.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Absolutely devastating, the worse person you know just made a great point."

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

She's terrible, but she doesn't crack the top 100 worst American politicians. Her point is accurate, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I suppose even a racist clock is right twice a day

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The horrible evil lady is right! Let's not do what she says otherwise.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

This is due to the rules of the Senate which state that committee seniority is given to the longest serving members. Both sides keep people in office as long as possible to secure these important positions.

[–] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

She's not wrong...

[–] jwagner7813@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Of course, attacking McConnell's health was part of the game plan. She's not wrong though.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Wow that huge bigot finally said something good. Let’s see where she is at 80.

load more comments
view more: next ›