this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
119 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19454 readers
5437 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ~~NYT~~FT has gone all in on "a new era of conservatism" with this article.

First, they directly compare tech bro billionaires flocking to bend the knee to Trump to the "surge in support for social justice causes" after the killing of George Floyd by police. Nothing problematic about that comparison, right?

CW:Offensive pejoratives published unredacted by the ~~NYT~~FTLater, they quote a "top banker" as saying, "We can say 'r*tard' and 'p*ssy' without fear of getting cancelled ... it's a new dawn."

I know the ~~NYT~~FT has always been conservative, but this together with the way the Washington Post has been cosying up to Trump, says a lot about where the US is headed.

Edit: wrong acronym

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"I feel liberated," said a top banker. “We can say ‘r*tard’ and ‘p*ssy’ without fear of getting cancelled … it’s a new dawn.”

Imagine how pathetic you'd have to be to say this statement unironically. But I guess that's why this loser didn't let them use their name.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He should fear a lot more than "being canceled".

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 8 points 1 week ago

Here’s a thought: if you’re being canceled, there’s likely a reason for it. Perhaps consider what circumstances brought you there.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Wonder how he feels about “hang the bankers, praise to Luigi!”

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its fucking bad. They're trying to paint the picture Trump wants to see of himself. Democracy is dying in the corner. I just hope Trump meets the same end his hero's have.

Its like the progressive era, but in reverse.

The Regressive Era

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Fascist oligarchy

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

"New" era. I don't think we've had a progressive candidate in office since the 1970s. We've been slipping towards fascism, minor stop gaps and small caveats/wins before full speed ahead into enacting Hitler's dream.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's pronounced "fascism."

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

FYI this is a Financial Times article, not the New York Times.

The NYT has its problems, but this feels like hastily posted anti media bullshit.

FT.com is not NYT.com. FT is owned by the Nikkei, basically Japan’s Dow Jones, or S&P500. Of course they’re going to be sucking up to idiot bankers.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And by that, they mean embracing the era of robber barons?