this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
472 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President Joe Biden commuted the sentences of 37 federal death row inmates to life without parole, sparing all but three convicted of high-profile mass killings.

Biden framed the decision as a moral stance against federal executions, citing his legal background and belief in the dignity of human life.

Donald Trump criticized the move as senseless, vowing to reinstate the death penalty.

Reactions were mixed: some victims’ families condemned Biden, while others supported his decision. Human rights groups praised it as a significant step against capital punishment.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

imagine running on "the deficit" and then whining that you can't spend millions to let the state kill someone.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

The State should not be allowed to punish someone by killing them. Capital punishment is merely revenge with the government acting as the hitman. There’s no way to prevent an innocent person from being accidentally murdered. And those 40 people are proof that it doesn’t act as an effective deterrent.

It’s a barbaric practice and we need to end it.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

99% of the time yes but the Hitler fact. Assad, Putin, etc. Actual large scale crimes against humanity

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There is an adage that says "Hard cases make bad law". In the end is a case of, what is preferred, let a guilt person go unpunished or punish an innocent person? I personally believe that it is never ok to punish an innocent person. And I think it is not even that extreme when we are talking about capital punishment or be "tough on crime", it is more like, do um prefer to under punish some guilt people or over punish others including some innocents?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes and No.

I agree completely in a fallible system these executions ought never exist.

However creating a framework of rules with outcomes and holding all accountable to them is the most morally / ethically benign thing we do as humans.

The state is the only ethical executor of these decisions.

BUT the system is fallible and made up of fallible people and isn’t always steered for the moral / ethical and as such your last sentence is even more truthful than even you meant it.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

I don't think one should be executed if their moral framework doesn't align with the laws created by the state.

I understand why we can't do this today, but I would much prefer the exile method to execution.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

We could have had colosseum executions where inmates fight to the death, hosted by Dana White and the UFC. But no, old man Biden has to ruin the fun.

[–] crossdl@leminal.space 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I kind of wonder if Biden is setting him up to execute Luigi and get on the wrong side of this current populist movement.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

even if he does get convicted, any execution probably won't happen in the next four years. death row appeals take a long time.

[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

~~The fed has nothing to do with that. He's being charged by the state of NY.~~ TIL they added on a few federal charges.

[–] King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 2 points 19 hours ago

He is also being charged federally. And that is the capital case.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

His incompetence killed hundreds of thousands his first term. This time he was hoping for a more direct approach. Biden spoiled his murderous fun.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think the government should have the power to kill people as a punishment, with that said I'm also not upset that the sentences of these three weren't commuted.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't understand the reasoning. you can't say you are anti death penalty and believe in dignity and sanctity of life or whatever but then turn around and say "except for these three motherfuckers"...

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think the government should be able to execute them. However, I am human, they're mass murders, and it's a situation I have no control over, so I'm not going to feel bad about not feeling bad that they're still on death row. I don't get to choose how I feel, just how I act. If it were me making the decision, I'd like to think I'd have commuted their sentences as well, even though I probably would have felt bad about doing so.

Although also, thinking about your comment more, I guess I don't really care about sanctity of life or anything like that. It's more of a power problem for me. Some people deserve to be killed, however nobody should be making that judgement and following through, because it's not something that can be accurately judged. No one should have that power, especially the people in charge. When someone dies who I feel deserves it, it not going to upset me. Would I have killed them? No. Would I have prevented their death if I could? Honestly, questionable, depending on the person and situation. Is that hypocritical? I don't know, maybe. There might not be an effective difference, killing through inaction vs killing through action, but there feels like a difference to me. Life isn't black and white, I'm driven by a malfunctioning blob of meat, and I do the best I can. I take great comfort in the fact I'm never going to have to make that choice. I hope this gives you some insight into how I view things.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

i was talking about biden's statements, not yours

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh, my bad. Thanks for giving me cause for self reflection anyways

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

no worries, good talk

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, it seems weird that a government of a country that one is a citizen of can choose to have you killed. But assisted suicide is illegal.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

People forgetting Biden is Catholic, and Catholicism is pretty anti-death penalty.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tell that to my Catholic trumper parents.

[–] WammKD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

I know it won't make a difference to them (who're the cafeteria Catholics, now?) but it is an official part of the catechism.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know of onlt one western country with death penalty: Belarus. And I'm pretty sure as soon as potato dictator dies, it will be abolished.

[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Provided that microdick Vlad doesn't pull a Ukraine on the country for trying to have democracy, and entering the EU and NATO

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Biden: Grants clemency indiscriminately for 1,500 people Public: Why did you let the Cash for Kids woman free Biden: Commutes death sentences selectively Public: Who made you judge, jury and executioner?

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biden: Grants clemency indiscriminately for 1,500 people indiscriminately Media: Why did you let the Cash for Kids woman free Biden: Commutes death sentences selectively Media: Who made you judge, jury and executioner?

FIFY... Real people honestly wouldn't care about any of this if the media wasn't trying to inspire outrage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›