this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
535 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

7270 readers
1443 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In over 30 years of practice, Dr. Errol Billinkoff rarely saw a man without kids come into his Winnipeg clinic to get a vasectomy. But since the pandemic began, he says it's become an almost daily occurrence.

And he's not alone.

"At first, I thought I was the only one who was noticing this," Billinkoff, who brought a no-scalpel vasectomy procedure to Winnipeg in the early 1990s, told CBC News in a November interview.

"But I am part of an international chat group where doctors who do vasectomies participate and the topic came up, and it's like everybody notices it."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you can't afford raising kids and also more and more people decide that they would rather just enjoy their life without the responsibility or or financial burden of raising kids. I don't know how i feel about this due to the our birth rate not doing so well, and instead of people having children, we have to import people into the country (which i have no problem with but that really isn't a solution).

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

that really isn't a solution

why not? are you afraid of johnny whitebread "real" ~~murican~~ canadian getting....replaced?

the fact that the 1% is shitting their pants over the declining birthrate makes me think it's fan fucking tastic. every industry's profit margin suffers from fewer babies. less money is spent on food, gas, clothes, giant SUVs, toys, medicine--literally everything you buy for yourself, you're also buying for your kids for 18 years. unless you don't have kids.

those poor, poor shareholders.

fuck them. low birthrate = GOOD.

also, please--who wants to have a kid just so they can explain to them why they're growing up in a toxic wasteland?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (6 children)

why not? are you afraid of johnny whitebread "real" murican canadian getting....replaced?

It's not a solution because, with a few exceptions, standards of living (and therefore reasons to not immigrate) are rising in most of the world, so in a few decades there likely won't be enough migrants to go around.

those poor, poor shareholders.

If it looks like only shareholders are having problems because of low birthrates in Japan and South Korea, then you should learn more about those places.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I’m sorry, there is an international chat group where a bunch of doctors that perform vasectomies congregate and talk about vasectomies?

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Gotta share the best practices, its like the postmarket os matrix chat where tech enthusiasts support each other improving builds ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, yeah, why not? There are international whatevers for almost anything, specially professional practices. It's less cumbersome and cheaper than relying on regulatory bodies to organize and run conventions or seminars. Most of these chats are informal and born from that kind of events as well.

Something I also learned from working with the health sector is that there are really very few 100% dedicated to their niche specialists in every area. Sure, there are many heart surgeons, but very few experts on ventricular septal defect surgery on children. And some of that stuff can be so complex as to be a sole area of dedicated study. It allows these kind of informal forums and encourages a strong mentor-apprentice dynamics. So it is not rare they hit the group chat every once in a while. I also learned there are over a dozen different ways to make a vasectomy procedure and some doctors know how to do a few but not all of them and there are reasons to prefer some over the others depending on the patient.

Welcome to the Internet - you're new here, I take it?

Is that weird? I'm in HVAC and I talk with fellow HVAC people all over the world. This is a thing with most fields. It doesn't seem at all weird that there would be groups of urologists online.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (8 children)

No kids, never wanted them, made sure I never have them. Happily married for 8 years, she never wants kids either.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Here's the thing about abortion in Canada ...

  • the right to abortion is not codified in law: the SCoC struck down the laws against abortion in 1988 based on our 1982 Charter of Rights
  • abortion is technically legal under the federal Health Act
  • this is why the Cons have stated they don't want to challenge women's ability to have an abortion ... because if they did in court, and it went to SCoC, the court could (and likely would) force the Con gov't to enact actual legislation forever enshrining abortion rights in Canadian law
  • the Cons, just like the GOP down south, are hoping to have enough power at some time to force change here -- but the problem is our SCoC works differently than SCOTUS (ie: zero judges are elected in Canada, ever); SCoC rulings are not based on original intent (and our Charter is vastly newer than America's founding documents); etc.
[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm doing my part.

But seriously, men should be more responsible when it comes to birth control and not leave it up to women, so I think this is a good thing.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (8 children)

men should be more responsible when it comes to birth control and not leave it up to women

Men literally only have 2 options: condom or vasectomy. Condoms don't feel good for either side, which is why both try to avoid using them. Vasectomies can be reversible, but require surgery and thus are costly, which of course makes it impossible or at the very least much less attractive for a large portion of society.

Yes, men can buy underwear that heats up their balls to temperatures that kill sperm, but I'd like you to go around spreading the word of discomfort through sweaty balls and see how far you get.

You know what feels way worse than condoms but is just as effective? Celibacy. Don't complain about how the sex you're having isn't good enough, say that the risks to your partner aren't important enough, or tell them that they're the only one that needs to be responsible. I can't imagine the type of person that would still sleep with you with those attitudes. (If you feel like fluid bonding with a person, great, that's your choice, but some of us don't want to, have multiple partners, or can't)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί