PC Gaming

8765 readers

494 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

191

Palworld ditches Pokéball-style summoning mechanic amid Nintendo legal battle (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 1 week ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How do Japanese patents differ from USA/CAN? My general understanding of patents is that they expire after 20 years - Pokemon is older than that. Do Japanese patents have a longer duration? Did Nintendo patent a game later than the originals?

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These patents were granted to Nintendo this year.

load more comments (2 replies)

[+] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works -65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (24 children)

I am not usually in favour of big companies bullying smaller companies with the law, but it's pretty egregious how much they were ripping off Pokémon.

Edited to add, apparently this was a really hot take. I am not saying that the gameplay between the games was similar, but I saw a comparison of several of the designs of the creatures for the first time when this whole kinda started kicking off a bit ago and it was the first time I realized how blatant the designs were lifted right from popular Pokémon. Combined specifically with the pokeball-alikes and like... I don't know how people can defend it. There's homage and then there's IP theft.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean like Pokémon “ripping off” Dragon Quest?

You can’t patent an art style.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For one, I didn't say you could patent an art style. But distinguishable character can be IP. You're like the fifth person to mention Dragon Quest and I've never heard of that comparison before, do you have any examples?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago

I'd be more willing to agree if Nintendo was going after them for similar art styles. They went after them for fucking throwing balls of all things. This is going to set a horrible precedent for the game industry.

So either Nintendo didn't believe the monster designs were rip offs, or they didn't feel it was a proper violation because they've shown themselves as willing to litigate.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I disagree with your premise but even if I agreed that any IP theft has occurred, why do you care? surely you're aware that nintendo aggressively invests in IP lawyers and lawsuits?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, yes, that's why the lawsuit was happening. I'm not sure what your point was. I care because I think that IP theft is wrong.

[–] Rbnsft@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

The lawsuite is Happening because of patent trolling..

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 5 points 1 week ago

that's actually not why the lawsuit is happening though..

load more comments (20 replies)

load more comments