this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
463 points (95.3% liked)

Fediverse memes

327 readers
1073 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Bluesky managed to go offline practically entirely. I count on you folks to spork the hell out of this.

See also here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scott@authorship.studio 1 points 2 hours ago

The interesting thing is that Bluesky might become federated because of bridges to the fediverse. You would be able to federate with Bluesky with a fediverse server.

[–] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 3 points 3 hours ago

bluesky is more federated than threads, but less federated than mastodon. As I understand it, you can more or less host your own bluesky "instance". Though it is difficult to do and some parts you have to build yourself, it is technically doable. This is not the case on threads, I believe.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 118 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Sorry, Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml were down for maintenance again. You were saying?

Can they do it again please?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the fact that I had no idea kinda disproves your point. I am browsing Lemmy a lot.

[–] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The joke is that most of lemmycels are on lemmy.world and lemmy.ml. Not that these instances literally went down.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 14 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Because most of the communities are on those 2 instances. In terms of userbase world does have the most users, but they're the exception as other "big" instances are more evenly split.

So instead of a single instance going down we have 2 main instances that need to go down, and even if they go down we'd have lemmee, shitjustworks, lemmyca and blahaj (and I guess also lemmynsfw) communities feeding the feed.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

(and db0 for the fun stuff, gosh)

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I could absolutely cruise games and memes on shit just works for a day if other instances are down

[–] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

I agree, having multiple main instance is better than what we had. Also thank you for reminding me lemmynsfw, time for donating.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

No idea what a lemmycel is or what that would have to do with bluesky

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml -5 points 14 hours ago

Please don't explain my joke. Just let it woosh over them.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, this user has posted on feddit.uk with a sh.itjust.works account. I would have been able to see it, but you wouldn't have.

To be honest, lemmy.world AND lemmy.ml could go offline I would barely notice it.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think I would mainly notice because my whole feed would be wholesome, supportive, and funny.

[–] gregor@gregtech.eu 1 points 15 hours ago

Lemmy.world is fine, as for lemmy.ml...

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago

Fuck you

^/s^

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I have them both blocked, so yeah, they aren't that important at all.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

i can understand blocking .ml, whats wrong with .world though?

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

They have "power users" that mod multiples of the largest communities and will delete comments of they disagree with your opinion, citing "civility" or other nonsense, even when you're repeating back exactly what was said to you. So, yeah, abusive moderation.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm actually a big fan of the misinformation moderating they're doing on world. It's very Lemmy.ml of them in trying to maintain their political correctness.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

I certainly want spreading misinformation, but I'm glad you're enjoying yourself on world.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Purely anecdotal but… the 3 stupidest people I’ve ever met online were all from .world - and there seems to be a propensity for deleting comments that go against their world view. Only knowingly interacted with one .ml poster and they were perfectly decent.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Look at this social butterfly who’s interacted with 3 people

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Well, I mean, they might’ve been bots I suppose. Perhaps I’m still an asocial caterpillar but don’t know it…

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

the 3 stupidest people I’ve ever met online were all from .world

That's a Hell of a claim!

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I know, seems wild… To clarify the statement I should have said “interacted with” as opposed to “met”. I’m not on many platforms though - no FB, insta, bebo, friends reunited, the old bird site etc. I used to interact on another site, forget what it was called, maybe Robbit or something like that. I’m on Mastodon but I have a different personality there and don’t use it for posting anyway.

I have a feeling that a few/many/lot of .world users have a very simplistic and binary view of the world where they can’t see that some issues are multifaceted and you can’t just throw out blanket statements. There also seems to be an issue with some people where they don’t/can’t differentiate between opinions versus facts. Opinions are personal whilst facts are (hopefully) empirical.

Rant over.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 1 points 5 hours ago

I’m not on many platforms though - no FB, insta, bebo, friends reunited, the old bird site etc.

I guessed you weren't on Facebook or Xitter as they're full of idiots.

There also seems to be an issue with some people where they don’t/can’t differentiate between opinions versus facts.

Wait until you try sarcasm!

Shit doesn't work

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Based on https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/14/24296537/bluesky-acting-up-outage-down it was down for 15-30 minutes and for some it was just read-only.

Lemmy instances regularly go down for maintenance longer than this.

Twitter used to regularly "fail whale" and in the long run no one cares.

Yes, decentralizing is a good thing. Yes, it's fun to poke at BlueSky. But in the long run if you have a product that people want to use then they'll put up with a lot of crap/downtime.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

The point is that bluesky has no interest in being actually decentralized, it's just a gimmick

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

Eh, I feel like the important part of decentralization right now is the potential to migrate.

Like, how many social media sites actually last 5 years before shitting the bed?

If admins of an instance get shitty, it's trivial to move to a new one. Traditional social media you'd have to migrate to a completely different site, with different features, layout, and other stuff.

People won't all wait for the same reason, as the biggest becomes actually "big" we'll see them start to fracture.

There just wasn't enough people on fediverse to start out like that.

So think of Blue sky, World, and all those other "big" instances that still don't have that many users as the egg for the future fediverse that actually has enough users to be proper decentralized

at least when an AP instance goes titsup people can hop on another instance. thats not currently possible with bluesky. to me that puts AP a step above AT

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

also incredibly easy for the federal government to take them out

[–] capital@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's more like """federated""".

load more comments
view more: next ›