this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1291 readers
50 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"The Greens have said they will wipe $81 billion in student debt — but how will they pay for it?"

Well, how about a single mining company paying even a teeny bit of tax?

Imagine that!

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is even worse than when journalists normally ask this question. It's a debt not a payment.

They will pay for it by finding a $2 coin in the centre console of their government funded car to buy a biro to cross off the line item.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Fuck me, the "rhetorical" question in the lede is answered in the article, buried in the fifteenth paragraph.

The policy proposal falls under the Greens' so-called 'Robin Hood reforms' and they have said they will pay for the plan by "taxing big corporations that are profiting off price gouging during a cost of living crisis".

This is borderline disinformation by sbs

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago

A society which charges students to acquire knowledge values neither.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 20 points 4 days ago

But then how would the established aristocracy elevate themselves above the common rabble to justify a company position that already has their name on it thanks to nepotism? Surely those poor nepobabies won’t have to compete with The Poors in the future! How unjust!

[–] Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone 8 points 4 days ago

Good we can get royalties from our gas exports to pay for it

[–] TinyBreak@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Great idea! But I see the greens have decided to run on more "Pie in the sky" bullshit policies. Dont get me wrong, im not dumping on trying to do the right thing which this arguably is. But its yet another promise thats virtually impossible to deliver on that makes people think twice about voting greens.

Remember that time they were gonna make it so you could swim in the yarra river?

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Why is it virtually impossible to deliver on? Higher education has been free in the past, right?

[–] TinyBreak@aussie.zone -1 points 4 days ago

it has yeah. But is this something thats going to move the needle for the majority of voters? The only people who care about this are young people, or people with ethics. And hate to say it but thats a lot shorter list than the greens seam to think it is.

They've gotta run a realistic platform, secure some more seats and deliver on some stuff. Bit like Trump coming out and saying "we are gonna make warp drive happen". He knows he cant deliver. We know it too, and nothing in his past makes you think any different. Same deal with the greens here. over promise under deliver doesn't work in politics.

Dont get me wrong, im not dumping on trying to do the right thing ...

That's exactly what you're doing.

[–] kerr@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Agreed. They need to get back to reality if they want to pick up votes at the next election.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

It continues their recent trend of being a party overwhelmingly focused on securing the votes of young people above all else.