this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
112 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3097 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somehow, I really don't think this will be the time China will bankrupt.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't they have many trillions in reserves? Of course they won't be bankrupt

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Don’t they have many trillions in reserves?

Right now China has about 3.2 trillion in ForEx of all kinds and currencies which means that this bailout represents nearly half of the total.

ForEx is an extremely complicated subject, way too much for a single post, but it is essentially the lubricant for trade. If you don't have enough of it in the right currency on an hourly (or less) basis to support your imports and exports then the machine will seize up.

So what China is doing here is risky as hell and if it doesn't work they will soon have the same kind of financial problems that Iran does and that is stupendously bad for an export based economy.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're not going to do this with cash. They'll print up some paper money (eg. bonds) like everybody else and make the poor subsidize the rich via inflation.

https://www.ft.com/content/b2feba22-5064-4eb1-84b1-3003cac36def

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The way I (state certified smoothbrain) think of it is this: Cash reserves serve as short time collateral when a state is shopping on credit (which states usually do). So your transactions need to be backed by a currency your trading partner is willing to accept.

Other types of reserves exist, but these usually need to be converted first, which adds a layer of delay and transaction that makes it a more long term thing.

Not sure how correct it is, but I find that this oversimplification works and is correct most of the time.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Bruh they can print the money for rich people just like USA does. It's the same capitalist system everywhere. The rich get richer and the poor continue to drown in inflation, etc.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kinda weird that they're calling the "collapsing real-estate sector" an economic challenge when that's completely on purpose

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What do you mean on purpose?

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

If the real estate market is doing good, that just means that housing is getting more expensive and investors get a lot of profit out of it. China did something (tbh I don't know what exactly they did) to make housing prices go down again. That means that investors lost money and the real estate market wasn't doing well. It was on purpose because the point was to make housing cheaper, which is a good thing, but if you only see housing as something to make profits from, then this means that that market isn't doing good.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they believe that the real estate collapse is a 4d chess move to entrap private equity. I'm also guessing they don't realize the largest real estate developers in China are already state owned entities...

SOE are owned by the state, but they are operated just like any other profit seeking organizations, and thus are not immune to the same problems with private equity we have in the west.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm guessing the state is just another fundamentally corrupt government that will print endless money to prop up the rich (including the state itself) at the cost of extreme inflation for the poor...

I mean this same thing happens in USA regularly and it's never a "trap" by the state for the rich people who run the state.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, don't get me wrong. The state is absolutely corrupt. But this sounds more like China is going through what the United States went through in 2008, which did not cause much inflation to consumers because there were more claims for money than there were money in existence. So printing money just caused less deflation than there otherwise would have been. That's absolutely still not a situation you want to be in though.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Won't this cause inflation for the Chinese or are their markets that controlled?

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does not sound like it. It seems more like the United States in 2008, where claims for money far exceeded money in existence. And therefore, when money is created, it does not actually cause inflation, but it causes less deflation than their otherwise would be.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

happy printer noises

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as a market so controlled that it's immune to inflation. The Russian Ruble is as controlled as a currency can be and Russia is teetering on the edge of hyper-inflation. It's core inflation rate is over 9% and their version of the "Prime Rate" for lending has now jumped from 19% to a historic 21%.

China has more breathing room than Russia but it's still not going to be pretty, especially if this "bailout" fails.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Such things happen when one decides to start a money burning competition with a block of countries with a combined GDP roughly 25 times that of russia.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

not sure who’s listening to this, but i thought i’d throw my hat in the ring. i can also burn all my money extremely quickly, if desirable.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Aren’t they currently in deflation

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1 yen is the equivalent of $.14. Their shit is already inflated to hell.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I thought it was pegged to the dollar somehow.