I could be wrong but I think the (..+?)
portion will either remove a dud or replenish the allowance.
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
328 points (97.7% liked)
Programmer Humor
32549 readers
601 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It matches for non-primes and doesn't match for primes.
The pipe is throwing me off because usually I have to do parentheses for that to work...
I'm I the only one who pronounces regex with a soft g? Hard g feels so clunky
All my homies hate regexs. That's actually the best use case I found for LLMs so far : I just tell it what I want it to match or not match, and it usually spits out a decent one
That sounds…
Easier to get almost right than actually learning the subject.
Much, much harder to get completely right than actually learning the subject.
So yes, basically the archetypal use case for LLMs.
load more comments
(2 replies)