this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
-47 points (11.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not even fucking close to what was said.

Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As an American left-wing non profit news outlet the Intercept has changed quite a bit over it's 10 years of reporting. In Ken Klippenstein's words..

"The Intercept has been taken over by suits who have abandoned its founding mission of fearless and adversarial journalism, and I can’t continue in an environment where fear of funders is more important than journalism itself"

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/why-im-resigning-from-the-intercept

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

So "fake news"?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There's no such thing as "financial innovation". There's just novel ways to fleece people of their money and dodge regulations. Just because there are some winners in a pyramid scheme doesn't mean the scheme itself is profitable.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between profitability and productivity.

A Ponzi scheme is profitable, for the person running it. It is not productive in that it (generally speaking) produces nothing of value. Pyramid schemes can be both profitable and productive, but they're also innately exploitation and based on a supply of new people to exploit.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

A mugging is profitable for one of the parties, it doesn't make the entirety of the mugging a profitable endeavor. Whether something is profitable depends on what level you're measuring profitability for.

[–] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

I regret that I have but one up vote to give.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Follow up question: why in the fuck would the people writing this ASSUME black voters are into crypto? Never touched it, and nobody in my family has either.

When did this become some of an extra racist fucking thing?

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think some study came out that said something like 20% of black men owned crypto and now we have this. No idea how it was measured.

Okay - a little digging and it does seem backed up by self-reported surveys. Best explanation I could find is https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/payments-system-research-briefings/the-cryptic-nature-of-black-consumer-cryptocurrency-ownership/

Basically, from the surveys, it would appear that Black adults own more crypto than whites, with Black men edging slightly higher. It looks to be on the order of 20% with other groups trailing by a few percentage points.

Disappointed in the Harris campaign for leaning into this, as it seems to be all self-reported survey data and hardly something to build a policy on. Also crypto is stupid, but that's just my opinion.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Disappointed in the Harris campaign for leaning into this,

They are pulling on every possible angle they can find, even the batshit crazy ones now. All so they keep sending those weapons to facilitate a far right wing government in Israel.

If you go to 538 and look at the projections, even if Harris wins every single "toss up" battleground state and trump only takes the battleground states leaning repub, she still loses. And magats tend to underreport in polls so its likely worse than it looks, and it already looks like a loss, and keeps trending worse every day. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2024-Electoral-Interactive-Map?promoref=promo_ElectionIndex

We're about to lose this race, because Americans just dont like AIPAC bribes.

The only way forward is to cut Israel loose and be neutral in their shitty war. Its time for Harris to show some leadership and save herself and all of us from Bidens bad choices. Status quo is not going to win this.

What say you centrists? Stay the course of our zionist paymasters into certain doom for the US or save the republic from destruction? You get to pick just one, so make it good. Israelis favor trump as their favorite pick by a factor of more than 2 to 1, so they can be counted on to make this even worse in the upcoming days.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago

The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Intercept:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theintercept.com/2024/10/21/kamala-harris-crypto-black-men/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support