this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
66 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4388 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 43 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Baier later asked Harris if she supports “using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender.” The question comes after a 2019 questionnaire filled out by Harris came to light. Her responses, which she gave while serving in the Senate, indicated she supported taxes being used to fund gender-affirming care for federal prisoners and detained immigrants.

Harris responded to Baier by pointing out that incarcerated people received gender-affirming healthcare under her opponent, Donald Trump.

“I will follow the law, and it’s a law that Donald Trump actually followed, you’re probably familiar with it now,” Harris said. “It’s a public report that under Donald Trump’s administration, these surgeries were available on a medical necessity basis to people in the federal prison system.”

One of the few times comparing herself to trump was a good idea.

Still would like her to say she'll follow the Leahy Law tho

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Providing medically nessecary care to prisoners of the state just feels like basic humanity.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

There's not exactly a lot that is humane about our prison system...

Well maybe, just maybe, you get the '08 me

Fresh out the county feeling crazy

No meds in eight months feeling turnt, don't play me

-King Fantastic

We throw people with mental health issues in jail with no meds for months pending trial then drop charges on the daily. Just release them on the streets with no money or way to feed themselves, let alone see a doctor and get back on meds.

I'm not saying we can't fix one thing if we don't fix everything, just that prison reform should be a much bigger topic than it is.

We ain't reforming prisoners, our justice system just produces more criminals. It's hard enough to get a job and a place to live, imagine if you had to do it with a felony, and you had 8 hours to solve it. It's starve or do more crime.

Shit isn't going to fix itself.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Why ask a candidate for a number like they're an encyclopedia or something? She's running for president, not chief of remembering trivia factoids.

[–] TrippaSnippa@lemm.ee 8 points 4 weeks ago

It's looking for a gotcha moment to take out of context. During the last Australian federal election the then-Opposition leader (now Prime Minister) was asked what the Reserve Bank cash rate was and he didn't know off the top of his head. The media and now-former government tried to beat it up as a big problem and proof that he wasn't fit to be PM, which is ridiculous (though his actual performance as PM so far is underwhelming). It did lead to a great moment a couple of days later though when they tried it on the leader of the Greens, who just replied "Google it, mate".

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

It's like when they ask someone "What is a woman?" like it's some gotcha. Whatever you answer, they'll find a way to twist, exaggerate, or simply lie about.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Asking for specifics is not disingenuous. People want to know details so asking for them is reasonable.

We have also seen people like Bernie Sanders rip off number after number without making mistakes, on multiple topics in a long form interview.

Its not some super power to rehearse and practice what you need to do until you remember it.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago

That interview was a joke. They wouldn't have constantly interrupted Trump like that.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 4 weeks ago

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-bret-baier-fox-interview-b2630590.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support