this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1335 readers
180 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

(page 4) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago

As anyone who's been paying attention already knows, LLMs are merely mimics that provide the "illusion of understanding".

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

v light, only weakly techtakes material, but I'm immature enough to want to share:

spoilerI just got a sales email from "Richard at Autodesk" titled "Hear from the probing experts"

Does anyone read these things before or after they're sent?

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does anyone read these things before or after they’re sent?

It sounds like spam - by my guess, they usually aren't read at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

New pair of Tweets from Zitron just dropped:

I also put out a lengthy post about AI's future on MoreWrite - go and read it, its pretty cool

Boo! Hiss! Bring Saltman back out! I want unhinged conspiracy theories, damnit.

It feels like this is supposed to be the entrenchment, right? Like, the AGI narrative got these companies and products out into the world and into the public consciousness by promising revolutionary change, and now this fallback position is where we start treating the things that have changed (for the worse) as fair accompli and stop whining. But as Ed says, I don't think the technology itself is capable of sustaining even that bar.

Like, for all that social media helped usher in surveillance capitalism and other postmodern psychoses, it did so largely by providing a valuable platform for people to connect in new ways, even if those ways are ultimately limited and come with a lot of external costs. Uber came into being because providing an app-based interface and a new coat of paint on the taxi industry hit on a legitimate market. I don't think I could have told you how to get a cab in the city I grew up in before Uber, but it's often the most convenient way to get somewhere in that particular hell of suburban sprawl unless you want to drive yourself. And of course it did so by introducing an economic model that exploits the absolute shit out of basically everyone involved.

In both cases, the thing that people didn't like was external or secondary to the thing people did like. But with LLMs, it seems like the thing people most dislike is also the main output of the system. People don't like AI art, they don't like interacting with chatbots in basically anywhere, and the confabulation problems undercut their utility for anything where correlation to the real world actually matters, leaving them somewhere between hilariously and dangerously inept at many of the functions they're still being pitched for.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Max Tegmark has taken a break from funding neo-Nazi media to blather about Artificial General Intelligence.

As humanity gets closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

The first clause of the opening line, and we've already hit a "citation needed".

He goes from there to taking a prediction market seriously. And that Aschenbrenner guy who thinks that Minecraft speedruns are evidence that AI will revolutionize "science, technology, and the economy".

You know, ten or fifteen years ago, I would have disagreed with Tegmark about all sorts of things, but I would have granted him default respect for being a scientist.

The first image in that second link is perhaps the most incoherent political cartoon I've ever seen. Why is Uncle Sam as played by Angry Jeff Bridges wearing the Chinese flag as a cape??

[–] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

After he started rambling about his Mathematical Universe Hypothesis, it was obvious his brain was cooked.

As humanity gets closer to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Arrow of time and all that, innit? And God help me, I actually read part of the post as well as the discussion comments where the prompt fondlers were lamenting that all it takes is one rogue ai code to end the world because it will "optimize against you!" I assume Evil GPT is constructing anti matter bombs using ingredients it finds under the kitchen sink.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is just straight-up gossip, but why not:

Tegmark used to go around polling physicists at conferences about which interpretation of quantum mechanics they prefer. A colleague of mine said that they were sitting near Tegmark and saw him fudging the numbers in his notes — erasing the non-Many Worlds tallies from those who said they supported Many Worlds as well as others, IIRC.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A tally mark that has been shifted unethically in order to win a nerd fight is now called a tegmark.

[–] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bless. You know I'm here for the hot goss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I remember he went on julia galef's podcast to talk about the MUH and she was like "but what does that mean" and simple questions like that and he flailed, it was painful to hear

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago

Speaking of twitter shit, I'm sad that it's back online in Brazil.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago

arggghhh no one can make me feel blind rage like this smarmy nazi piece of shit can

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You know, I can't tell if this is supposed to be "I know you're saying that calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, but it's more complicated than that" or "I know calling unhoused people vermin is some Nazi shit, and I'm honestly okay with that".

Gonna guess the latter given where it's coming from and the fact that the actual "more complicated" is a salad of non sequiturs.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

eigen is squarely in the tpot crew

it's definitely not coming from a good place

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›