this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

Australian Politics

1271 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
daniel@aussie.zone
Whirlybird@aussie.zone
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone
billytheid@aussie.zone
14
In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined? (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by bpalmerau@aussie.zone to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Go Annabel. The history of taxation is not only interesting but vital knowledge.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can we get some more informative titles? ๐Ÿ™ƒ

[โ€“] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for gently correcting the noob. Now I know how to do better.

[โ€“] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

โค๏ธ

[โ€“] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for gently correcting the noob. Now I know how to do better.

[โ€“] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the post, in general when posting news articles please use the source title and put your personal commentary in the post body or a separate comment. I apologise for not putting this in the community sidebar yet but this is something we tend to do across the instance. It would be good if you could please change the title to the correct one:

In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined?

[โ€“] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

In the negative gearing debate, wouldn't the real scandal be if changing it WASN'T examined?