this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

663 readers
220 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source Bloomberg article

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The worst thing is that, in this timeline, antitrust would probably let this happen.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Apollo investment may not be all that bad. If anything the $5 billion would give the company some more breathing room.

Qualcomm buying out Intel would be terrible for competition.

$5 billion would give the company some more breathing room.

Intel stock price is quite low, still has a huge upside and Apollo will probably get a board seat at minimum. It looks better for Apollo rather than Intel.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

$5B is not even enough for overrun costs of one of the 4(?) foundries currently being built, and that will be obsolete by the time they're finished.

Intel strategy on foundries was not enough to keep them competitive in the last decade or 2. I have seen no sign that this time will be different.