this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
495 points (99.4% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2805 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Tax Justice Network said trillions could be raised with a ‘featherlight’ tax on the 0.5% of richest households, copying a current Spanish tax

Governments around the world copying Spain’s wealth tax on the super-rich could raise more than $2tn (£1.5tn), according to campaigners calling for the money to help finance the climate transition.

As a growing numbers of countries consider raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy, the Tax Justice Network campaign group said in a report that evidence from a “featherlight” tax on the 0.5% richest households in Spain could help raise trillions of dollars globally each year.

The Spanish government, under the socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, introduced a temporary “solidarity” wealth tax in late 2022, which is collected in 2023 and 2024, on the net wealth of individuals exceeding €3m (£2.6m). It is estimated to apply to the richest 0.5% of households.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 133 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the rich are ruining every country, every economy except for their own, and the environment. let's make the rich extinct before they make all of us extinct.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re also destroying the entire biosphere

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Nah man it’s the bioflat, wake up sheeple!

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It would be a good start but then new rich would emerge to take their place. Maybe we should just put "re-enact French revolution" on a 100 year calendar reminder.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, that is what regulations are for. Monopolies used to be regulated more after they caused the great depression. Been done before can be done again.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

I also read they started doing this in some American state and it raised 1.8 billion dollars. If this idea appeals to you, try to find out if there are any petitions in your country that suggest something like this. If you're from the Netherlands, the SP has a petition like this.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

That's HORRIBLE! We should INSTEAD be Taxing Homeless Mothers to raise that Money INSTEAD!

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

The rich are going to get to the "find out" stage one way or the other. Do I generally like a wealth tax? No. Do I think it's needed now because Republicans fucked up our country with repeated tax cuts for the rich over 60 years that we would never otherwise recover from? Yes.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because this is a tax on assets and not income it seems to me that there could be some unfair situations, for example you inherit a property that is not so easy to sell and are now taxed on it, or you have shares/stocks in your startup company and are now taxed on it even though you haven’t sold them (and quite possibly can’t sell them).

I believe it would be better to tax income while closing some of the loopholes like allowing borrowing money against stocks and properties.

[–] samokosik@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately finding a realistic way on how to do it is close to impossible

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why, just tax based on value at a given date. In the Netherlands they tax bank value based on december 31st amounts over a specific value. And your house. They can also do that with portfolios of shares, bonds and other things people can use as collateral.

If you can borrow against a portfolio of shares, we can tax it too.

[–] samokosik@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Make taxes too high and instead of people paying it, they will just move to another country where they don’t have to.

load more comments
view more: next ›