this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
808 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

5404 readers
3812 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I know trump is just an idiot repeating things he's been told or has heard somewhere on repeat but there is something credible to that idea.

It's the one downside in my opinion to protected areas and parks. No one is allowed to do anything in them that is seen as unnatural. I wouldn't suggest logging a park but selectively removing and cleaning up debris / dead trees should definitely be a thing.

They are a giant fire hazard.

A natural forest has regular fires to clear out the underbrush and dead debris. Parks never allow fires to occur and that dead debris builds up to a point that if a fire did happen, absolutely nothing would survive the heat whereas smaller more regular fires would allow for some of the older and stronger trees to survive and repopulate, depending on the forest ecosystem.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

This is nonsense. Parks do prescribed burning all the damned time. That's the entire point of the USFS. They make sure fire clearings are all in the correct places and do their best to prevent large fires from breaking out.

Clearing out "debris" is an impossibility. Where would you put it? There's far, far too much land for that to be realistic. You'd need teams of millions of people and the logistics of such a thing would be insane.

Not only that but it would be an ecological disaster. All sorts of plants and animals rely on that debris to live. "The forest" isn't just the trees.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Can't have forest fires, if you have no forests. tapstemple.meme

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago

As someone not from the US. Keep the memes coming. They're hilarious. And by that I mean I hope both Trump and Biden make it to the election just for the lulz 😂.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›