this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
179 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12306 readers
675 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marighost@lemm.ee 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is that a snake in your trousers or is that a snake in your trousers or is that a snake in your trousers or

[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago

No. Jusssst realllly happy to sssssee you!

[–] Arve@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

I have had it with these motherfucking snakes in these motherfucking pants!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll stick with a single trouser snake, thank you.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There are specialists that can help you have that removed if you need...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Kinda? I love mine! I call him Shirley…

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Congratulations! 👍

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hmm. I think I've heard this confucius saying before. How does it go... Man in China caught with 100 snakes in trousers suffers not from reptile disfunction.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That’s approximately 100 too many.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On average a person has approximately .5 snake in their pants

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

More like .7 after this mfer

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago

Folks be makin' jokes, but, sadly, animal trafficking is a real problem. Who knows what those poor snakes were going to be used for. It's tremendously sad.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

"Is that 100 snakes in your pants, or are you just happy to see me?"

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

With that many snakes in there, I feel like he was in the snakes' trousers.

Better headline: Man Caught in Snakes' Trousers!

[–] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

100 snakes in trousers

Are there 100 single-legged trousers, or 50 trousers with 2 snakes in each ~~leg~~ trouser?

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

If there's 2 snakes in each legs then you only need 25 trousers.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Wasn't this a scene from an Ernest movie?

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

Alright, showoff

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 4 months ago
[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

However, only one of the snakes was one-eyed.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

“Is that a snake in your pants, or are you just happy to see me?”

“Snake. Definitely a snake.”

“Rude!”

“Tell me about. His ballsss sssmell like old gym sssocksss.”