this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
18 points (87.5% liked)

c/TodayILearned

8 readers
1 users here now

Have you learned something new today? Share it here and gain incite from others!


Please Observe Instance Rules:

  1. Do not violate any laws, third-party rights, and/or proprietary rights.
  2. Do not harass others, be abusive, threatening, and/or harmful.
  3. Do not be needlessly defamatory and/or intentionally misleading.
  4. Do not upload without marking obscene and/or sensitive content as such.
  5. Do not promote racism, bigotry, hatred, harm, and violence of any kind.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be clear, there's no way the idea of "two becoming one" only started in the 1600's. The idea is mentioned all the way back in the second chapter of the first book of the Bible: "A man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh."

[โ€“] yata@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is an extremely Anglocentric TIL.

Also this bit, apparently written by accomplished historians if the author credentials are to be trusted, made me chuckle:

In mainland Europe in the Dark Ages (roughly 500 to 1000 A.D.), populations were so sparse, spread out, and loosely organized that last names were not necessarily needed to function in society.